RCM Process · Phase 2

Define Functions & Performance Standards

Answer RCM Question 1: what is this asset supposed to do, and to what standard, in its current operating context?

Purpose

Every failure is a failure to perform a function. If the functions aren't written down clearly — with a verb, an object and a measurable standard — the rest of the analysis has nothing to hang on.

Scope

  • Primary functions (why the asset exists)
  • Secondary functions (safety, control, containment, comfort, appearance, economy, environmental)
  • Performance standards (desired vs. built-in capability)
  • Operating context (duty, environment, redundancy, throughput)

Process Steps

  1. 01

    Document operating context

    Intent

    Capture duty cycle, environment, redundancy and any process-imposed limits so every function statement reads against the real conditions the asset works in.

    Inputs
    • Signed charter and boundary diagram from Phase 1
    • Operator interviews and control-room logs
    • Design basis / process flow diagrams
    • Recent process, throughput or feedstock changes
    Actions
    • Write a short context statement (1–2 paragraphs)
    • Record duty cycle, ambient conditions and any redundancy or standby capacity
    • Note recent context changes (higher throughput, new feedstock, deferred capex, seasonal duty)
    • Confirm with operations that the description matches how the plant actually runs today
    People

    Operations supervisor and control-room lead confirm real duty. Process engineer verifies against design. Reliability engineer records.

    Process

    Context is written before functions. If the context changes later, function statements are re-tested — not silently rewritten.

    Technology

    Operating context template stored in the RCM pack. Reference to process flow diagrams and DCS trends.

    What Good Looks Like
    • Every reliability, maintenance and operations lead can point to where this step lives — decisions, evidence and outputs are in one place, not in someone's inbox.
    • The opposite of: copying the design basis and calling it context
    • The opposite of: ignoring recent throughput or feedstock changes
    • The opposite of: skipping operator input
    What Bad Looks Like
    • Copying the design basis and calling it context
    • Ignoring recent throughput or feedstock changes
    • Skipping operator input — duty cycle assumed from spec sheets
    Outputs
    • Documented operating context statement
    • Register of recent context changes with dates
    • Confirmed duty and redundancy assumptions
  2. 02

    List primary functions

    Intent

    State exactly what the asset must do — verb + object + measurable performance standard — so failure has a clear benchmark.

    Inputs
    • Operating context from Step 2.1
    • P&ID tag numbers and design duty
    • Instrument ranges and process control set-points
    Actions
    • Use active verbs: pump, contain, filter, convey, isolate
    • Quantify performance: flow, pressure, temperature, cycle time, availability
    • One function per statement — split composite duties into separate lines
    • Number functions so failure modes can reference them (F1, F2, …)
    People

    Operator and process engineer confirm the real performance standard. Reliability engineer records.

    Process

    Every function has a verb, object and measurable standard. Statements without a number cannot pass into Phase 3.

    Technology

    Function register (spreadsheet or RCM software) linked to P&ID tags.

    What Good Looks Like
    • Every reliability, maintenance and operations lead can point to where this step lives — decisions, evidence and outputs are in one place, not in someone's inbox.
    • The opposite of: vague statements like 'work properly'
    • The opposite of: bundling multiple functions into one line
    • The opposite of: copying design capability instead of the real operating standard
    What Bad Looks Like
    • Vague statements like 'work properly' — nothing to fail against
    • Bundling multiple functions into one line
    • Copying design capability instead of the real operating standard
    Outputs
    • Numbered primary function list with measurable standards
    • Cross-reference to P&ID tag numbers
  3. 03

    List secondary functions

    Intent

    Cover the ESCAPES categories (Environmental, Safety, Control, Appearance, Protection, Economy, Structural) so protective and hidden functions are never missed.

    Inputs
    • Primary function list from Step 2.2
    • HAZOP, safety case and environmental permit conditions
    • Alarm and trip schedules; relief-device register
    Actions
    • Walk the asset with an operator — protective devices are always missed on paper
    • Cross-reference safety case, HAZOP and environmental permits
    • List every alarm, trip, relief, containment and standby function
    • Confirm secondary functions have their own measurable standards
    People

    Operator walk-down with reliability engineer. HSE representative confirms safety and environmental duties.

    Process

    Secondary functions sit under the primary function they support. Protective functions carry a note that they are hidden — flagged for Phase 5.

    Technology

    Function register linked to HAZOP node IDs and safety-instrumented-system schedules.

    What Good Looks Like
    • Every reliability, maintenance and operations lead can point to where this step lives — decisions, evidence and outputs are in one place, not in someone's inbox.
    • The opposite of: missing protective functions
    • The opposite of: treating alarms as inputs rather than functions in their own right
    • The opposite of: assuming standby equipment doesn't need functions defined
    What Bad Looks Like
    • Missing protective functions — hidden failures go undetected in Phase 5
    • Treating alarms as inputs rather than functions in their own right
    • Assuming standby equipment doesn't need functions defined
    Outputs
    • Complete secondary function list under each parent primary function
    • Cross-reference to safety case / HAZOP node numbers

People

Operator input is non-negotiable — operators know the real performance standard. Reliability engineer records; process engineer confirms design intent.

Process

Function statements are the single source of truth for everything downstream. Never begin failure modes until every function has a measurable standard.

Technology

Function register (spreadsheet or RCM software). Link to P&ID tag numbers.

Phase Outputs

  • Numbered function list per asset
  • Documented operating context statement
  • Confirmed performance standards (desired capability)

What Good Looks Like

  • Every reliability, maintenance and operations lead can point to where this phase lives — decisions, evidence and outputs are all in one place, not in someone's inbox.
  • The opposite of: vague functions like 'work properly'
  • The opposite of: missing secondary/protective functions
  • The opposite of: copying design specs instead of the real operating standard

Common Pitfalls

  • Vague functions like 'work properly' — nothing to fail against
  • Missing secondary/protective functions — hidden failures go undetected
  • Copying design specs instead of the real operating standard