CMMS Guide · MU-TLM-001

Task List Naming Convention

The description standard for task lists so planners find the right one and reports group them cleanly.

Purpose

The task list description is what a planner reads on screen when picking a job. A consistent description means the right list is picked every time, and grouping in reports (compliance, backlog, workload) actually makes sense.

Scope

  • All task list header descriptions
  • All task list step descriptions
  • Applies to newly created and legacy task lists as they are revised

Key Terms

TermMeaning
Header descriptionThe single-line description of the whole task list.
Step descriptionThe one-line description of each numbered step inside the task list.

Sections

  1. 01

    Header description pattern

    Intent

    Force a consistent word order so lists group and sort predictably.

    Actions
    • Pattern: OBJECT TYPE — TASK — INTERVAL (e.g. PUMP CENTRIFUGAL — INSPECT — 500 H).
    • Object Type mirrors the Object Type Component Naming standard.
    • Task verb from the approved list: INSPECT, LUBRICATE, REPLACE, CALIBRATE, CLEAN, TEST, OVERHAUL.
    • Interval in units (H = hours, M = months, K = cycles) — never spelt out.
    What Good Looks Like
    • Publish sample task lists that show the standard done well.
    What Bad Looks Like
    • Free-text descriptions with abbreviations only the original author understands.
    • Bundling multiple intervals into one header ('inspect / lubricate 500 H / 2000 H') — reporting can't split them.
  2. 02

    Step description pattern

    Intent

    Make each step scannable and unambiguous on the printed work pack.

    Actions
    • Pattern: ACTION — TARGET — REFERENCE (e.g. CHECK — DRIVE END BEARING TEMP — ≤ 65 °C).
    • Action verb from the approved list.
    • Target names the component using the Object Type Component Naming standard.
    • Reference gives the acceptance criterion or standard (limit, torque, procedure code).
    What Good Looks Like
    • Print a laminated cheat-sheet of allowed verbs and units for planners.
    • Publish sample task lists that show the standard done well.
    What Bad Looks Like
    • Free-text descriptions with abbreviations only the original author understands.
  3. 03

    Language & symbols

    Intent

    Remove ambiguity from search, print and translation.

    Actions
    • UK English spelling.
    • Units always SI (mm, °C, Nm, kPa).
    • No embedded free notes — put those in the long-text field, not the description.
    What Good Looks Like
    • Print a laminated cheat-sheet of allowed verbs and units for planners.
    What Bad Looks Like
    • Free-text descriptions with abbreviations only the original author understands.
    • Bundling multiple intervals into one header ('inspect / lubricate 500 H / 2000 H') — reporting can't split them.
  4. 04

    Approvals

    Intent

    Prevent silent drift from the standard.

    Actions
    • Data Steward reviews new task list descriptions during the master data sign-off step.
    • Legacy descriptions are updated when the task list is next revised — not in bulk.
    What Good Looks Like
    • Print a laminated cheat-sheet of allowed verbs and units for planners.
    • Publish sample task lists that show the standard done well.
    What Bad Looks Like
    • Free-text descriptions with abbreviations only the original author understands.
    • Bundling multiple intervals into one header ('inspect / lubricate 500 H / 2000 H') — reporting can't split them.

Best Practices

  • Print a laminated cheat-sheet of allowed verbs and units for planners.
  • Publish sample task lists that show the standard done well.

Common Pitfalls

  • Free-text descriptions with abbreviations only the original author understands.
  • Bundling multiple intervals into one header ('inspect / lubricate 500 H / 2000 H') — reporting can't split them.
  • Mixing units within one task list — planners misread limits.